Chapter 10: Managing Potential Risks and Enhancing Potential Benefits: Identification and Analysis of Management Tools and Policy Options

نویسندگان

  • Reynaldo Ariel Álvarez
  • John Komen
چکیده

The present chapter focuses on recommending a set of tools and policy options to manage potential risks and to enhance potential benefits derived from applications of gene modification (GM) of plants through modern biotechnology in maize (Zea maize). Specific questions to be addressed in the chapter—with particular reference to the situation in Mexico—include the following: Rationale for applying GM technology in developing countries To date, most of the developments in plant gene transfer technology and the different strategies to produce improved transgenic plant varieties have been driven by the market value of the species or the trait. These economical values are in turn mainly determined by their importance to agriculture and/or the economy in the developed world, particularly the United States and Western Europe. This is understandable because significant investments are needed to develop, field-test and commercialize new transgenic plant varieties. It may actually be in the rural and small farm where biotechnology could have a major impact on increased crop production, especially in areas of the world where yields are low due to a lack of technology. This may also contribute to the survival of the small farmer and all the cultural traditions that they represent. Enhancing the potential benefits Many of the biological pest problems that affect large-scale maize growers are shared by the smallholder using landraces. Among these are insect pests, rootworms and weeds (in many cases teosinte). Besides these, because the rural communities in many cases use marginal soils, there are specific problems such as drought, soil fertility and aluminum toxicity typical of acidic or basic soils. However, regardless of how many important genetic traits scientists think may be part of the solutions required by rural communities, the only way to ensure that the technology reaches these people is by including them in the research and development process from the very early stages, keeping in mind that the interests of smallholders are different from the large commercial growers. The technology needs to be understood by the people who are going to use it and they must agree to test and compare the new materials with whatever they are using. Benefits should be clear to them in the field rather than in the discourse. Managing potential risks Whatever the benefits are, qualitative or quantitative, of applying biotechnology to solve agricultural problems in the developing world, and particularly in the case of Mexico, one thing must be completely clear to all those involved—growers, regulators, scientists, NGOs, politicians, and the public: that the introduction of transgenes into an open pollinated crop, and in particular the maize landraces, which are subject to agricultural practices that promote extensive seed exchange, can inevitably lead to the widespread distribution of transgenes among these crops, maybe with the future impossibility of going back to the original state. The identification of management tools to mitigate or avoid potential risks involved with the release of transgenic maize will vary according to the specific situation. In general, risk management options can be classified as avoiding, mitigating or tolerating risk. The chapter discusses the available options in two broad categories: (1) Biological tools available to avoid GMO risks associated with gene flow; and (2) Policies and regulations to manage GMO risks. The possible role of a moratorium or ban is not discussed at length in this chapter, but is mentioned in Chapters 1 and 5 of the volume. In addition, several fundamental management issues are not analyzed here because they would each warrant more extensive treatment. These include the role of informed consent, burden of proof, uncertainty, liability, relief, and scientific standards for risk and benefit analysis. These issues have been raised in other chapters in this volume.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?

Background Negotiations surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade and investment agreement have recently concluded. Although trade and investment agreements, part of a broader shift to global economic integration, have been argued to be vital to improved economic growth, health, and general welfare, these agreements have increasingly come under scrutiny for their direct and indirect...

متن کامل

Developing a Method for Assessing and Managing the Risk of Covid-19; Rapid Covid-19 Hazard analysis

Background and aims: Work environments are constantly changing under the influence of various factors and newer risks are introduced. Rapid changes in science and technology, increasing the complexity of the industry, increased system integration and other factors have been shown to increase total risk in the past few decades. As well, risk management becomes increasingly critical in decreasing...

متن کامل

Identifying Tools and Methods For Risk Identification and Assessment in Construction Supply Chain

The construction project is a business full of risk in every process due to its complexity, changes, and involvement from various stakeholders. One of the critical risks in the construction project is in the supply chain. Identifying and assessing the risk with the right tools and methods in that area will inevitably affect the success of the project. Unfortunately, the research for the tools a...

متن کامل

Potential Benefits and Downsides of External Healthcare Performance Evaluation Systems: Real-Life Perspectives on Iranian Hospital Evaluation and Accreditation Program

Background Performance evaluation is essential to quality improvement in healthcare. The current study has identified the potential pros and cons of external healthcare evaluation programs, utilizing them subsequently to look into the merits of a similar case in a developing country.   Methods A mixed method study employing both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis techniqu...

متن کامل

A Qualitative Assessment of the Evidence Utilization for Health Policy-Making on the Basis of SUPPORT Tools in a Developing Country

Background SUPPORT tools consist of 18 articles addressing the health policy-makers so that they can learn how to make evidence-informed health policies. These tools have been particularly recommended for developing countries. The present study tries to explain the process of evidence utilization for developing policy documents in the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) and...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004